sábado, 25 de fevereiro de 2012

How would be the world without internet ?



On the internet exists both negative and positive view points.

Nowadays the internet facilitates many things, its very fast and practical there is contact between people , rapid studies and summary … and various other needs that the internet can supply .

But because of the this people change and abandon the books by the fact that internet is more practical .

The world would be better without the internet.

The people would give more value to study, if we have endeavor to learn.

Internet nowadays is fundamental in the internet, but perhaps if never had existed the internet people will have more endeavor to obtain what they desire and learn to go after of what they want without have everything in hands.

quinta-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2012

How world would be the word without internet?

The world would be bad,because would not have all things so rapidly.
Because with it we can surf in any site and find all we want in seconds.
Without it would be good for the newspapers,because without it everybody
 would not know the news so rapidly,people will go buy newspapers,thus,the enterprise
 of newspapers would go enrich.

quarta-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2012

WHAT WOULD BE THE WORLD WITHOUT INTERNET?

           WHAT WOULD BE THE WORLD WITHOUT INTERNET?

 It is difficult to reply that question because some people m enjoy and others do not . The maiority of people go  because is a between another ,but now a days the youngare very munch addicted to internet , with online games etc .. But this addiction is getting worse with problem in vision tha causes blindness . Because is in my point of view i think if trere isn't the internet would be bad for parentes . The internet makes more easy a research and also communication , EX : msn ; orkut ; facebook and etc...


How would be the world without internet?


The internet in the last years became the big MEANS of communication that EXISTS, WE are dependent of the internet, if a day happen the world stay without internet would be A chaos AND peoples would suffer large consequences.
The internet is the best means of fun: you can talk with your friends; play online games, can also create sites of fashion, cooking, investments and etc. But the internet IS also BEEN used to steal people you think that YOU ARE talking with a friend, but in truth, can be a villain IN disguise.
The world is already accustomed with the internet, if the internet DOES not exist ANY more would BE a worldwide catastrophe and the world would not BE prepared to suffer a great war between humans and the virtual world.

How Would Be World Without Internet ?


    
The technological evolution has been the key to the solution of several problems in the globalized world and the human being has sought on internet the practicality in the fields of labor, information anad also on entertainment.

      Currently we can consider us as depentents of this vehicle of communication that helps us, so much: from a simple domestic task to something much more broad and complex. So becomes very difficult to us imagine the life without internet, with the accelerated grouth and the speed with that the time is passing, that tool can not be destroyed, because would be a regression very big in the cuture evolution of humanity.


Laís Alves

How Would Be World Without Internet ?



Would be a world less advanced technologically. The information will spend more time to circulate around the world, that would left the people less updated about recent events.

Many people will be unemployed because the majority of professions now on the internet are indispensable.
For students will be more difficult to do works and researches about certain issues, because they will have to research in others sources such as books, which will delay that research more than internet that is much more faster and practical.

The people will stop to communicate by internet which consequently will difficult that people which are distant of yours parents and friends will keep less contact  with the others.

The addicts will think it's bad, but there will be a positive side they will go out more, they will practice more sports, among others things that will make them stop with their sedentary lifestyle.

                                                                                    Maria Rita

sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2012

How Would Be World Without Internet?



In my opinion would be a great damage, both on work and in some education of work the internet is the base of all, and in education the research made on internet in many homes has more information than a book, in some se conds I can travel to the present, past and up to future.
Without internet, the world will return to  that the people lived, not in front of a machine, but doing physical things, like talk face to face  with people, while children play with other children of  spinning top. We could createn more healthy  rabits  than sedentarism. Not enly the adducts but the children are  each  more in the on line world and are for geting of ceack to the  reality.

How hould be the word without Internet ?

How hould be the word without Internet? This is a good question. Currenty it is estimaded that 99% of youngs have access to the internet. With the technologies that facilitates alot nowadays, but that has positives and negatives sides: 99% of these youngs are most time connected , in social networks. The youngs that spend most part of their day connected on internet develop a type of disorder : the dissociative indetily or multiple personalitie disorder , this is a negative side.

Welt the lases that the internet can provide, the people have abandoned the books that should not happen because books are precious that provides us a good knowledge.

sexta-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2012

World Without Internet: WHAT?



Nowadays, the Internet is a means of comunication almost essentials for everybody. Though that the access of informations around the world is made in seconds. Talking with people around the world can be made in any hour or any place of the globe. But, and if this lase didn't exist? If the Internet was extinct or simply was a mynth of our society? Probably the most affected would the young. The homeworks would take much time to be made, after all it would be taken of books an old documents. And talking about documents, it would be exctint together with olds typerwrites, which make them more fragile and consuming more time to make. The Foruns of Justice would heap of many documents that they would have to sace, and for not mention how much they would affect the nature, with a more devastation of trees to make more paper. But the lack of the Internet has it's benefits. For example, the percentage of obesity and sendetary would decrease a lot, finally the single thing of the kids would have to do would play! People would do more physical contact and would be less concerned with the new music that they have to download or update their twitter and facebook. So, it is more difficult imagine the world without Internet, because it's already part of life os the most world population, like the TV, the magazines, newspapers, etc. If the Internet is good or bad, nobody knows but, like or no, it's a thing that we can't be without!

Thalia Silveira

 How would be the whithout internet ?           



The internet is the mean of communication more used today, to all type of information, in my opinion it is the vehicle of communication that makes the world more and globalized.
The mews circulate in network with more speed, decreasing the audience of news TV,  the internet besides very quick, is accessible. With many sites to all the tastes is impossible do not become an addiction, the world without internet would less interconnected, the way of expand a business would be much more difficult with, blogs and social networks the advertising arrives more fast to the reader. Today big artists are revealed by internet, them without it all be more difficult, such as, talk to someome in any place of the world.

                                                                                                                
  Nátali Silvestre

How Would be The World Whithout Internet?


Have you ever sttoped to think how would be the world whithout internet? Questions like this very discussed in day-to-day.
There are Bills like SOPA and PIPA that wish end with the piracy on the internet, but will that favor all? Of causse not! Because will end with the freedom of expression and with the mean of comunication more used in the world where people were more problematic and stressed.
In my opinion the SOPA and PIPA should be extinct and the money that are employee these Bills should be diverted to the african population that the most needed in the world.

Thassyo Sales

how would be the world whithout internet?


The world without internet would be one world without
technology and lack of communication, in a world without
internet the society would be without access to the news
that appears all the time, the difficulty of to know more
on something such as homework...
but it also has a positive side: many teenagers would leave
the addiction of internet personaly ending with the sedentarism
the obsession that all must be by technology, but also has the
negative side: the knowledge that would diminish.
then by one side is good by other side is bad.



Adelmo Junior...


                         How would be the world whithout internet? 

Without a doubt that the world would be better. Some people do not read books anymore and thinks that can take advantage staying on the computer by hours, changing their life by a affectet mode as if lived. Losing time in vain. The internet is like TV, it says what to do and this will form the thought of persons. The resuet will not be good. Gossips, offenses, futility exposed for anyone. From childhood to old age will be like this an alienation.

WHAT WOULD BE THE WORLD WITHOUT INTERNET?


IN TODAY´S WORLD THE INTERNET IS USED FOR TO DO MANY THINGS, FROM WORK TO HAVE FUN. WITHOUT THE INTERNET OUR LIFE WOULD BE COMPLICATED.

THE COMUNICATION BETWEEN DISTANTE PLACE WOULD NOT EXIST. WE WOULDN´T KNOW WHAT HAPPENS IN CHINA. THE GLOBALIZATION WOULDN´T HAPPEN. MANY PEOPLE WOULD DIE BECAUSE WITHOUT THE ADVANCE OF TECHNOLOGY IN SCIENCE FIELD WE COULDN´T CREATE DRUGS TO CURE SOME DISEASES.

ON THE OTHER HAND, LIKE THE NTERNET ALSO BRINGS GOOD THINGS, THE WORLD WITHOUT INTERNET WOULD HAVE BENEFITS. THE RELATION BETWEEN PEOPLE WOULD IMPROVE AND THE PHISICAL CONTACT WOULD INCREASE.

GABRIELA  SOARES


how would be the world without the internet ? well, to begin with , the world without internet would be horrible and very difficult ; would be  as in decades past , people to communicate would use letters, the distance friendship would be more rare and also valued , the people would read more books , and speak more personally ... and perhaps they would have more consistent attitudes , because people say by internet that love you and personally do not know you ; and as all things have its good and bad side likewise happens with the internet , just emphasizing that would be difficult to live without  it (internet) . i do not want !! god forbid .




How would be the world  without internet?
  The world without internet ,one world turn off,the world each day is more advanced and people are each day more depending on the internet,one example: today we con do shopping by internet without  worry about leave home, today the internet helped much because you,not only know about your city ,but also about the world .But some people even with the internet and its advance ,never leave books and its knowledge,with books is possible to improve the writing and read depper  an gain more knowledge.

sexta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2012

Entenda como funcionam as eleições americanas

Republicano que disputará presidência contra Obama em 6 de novembro será definido em prévias do partido que podem durar até julho

Carolina Cimenti, de Nova York | 02/01/2012 08:00


Foto: Getty Images
Pré-candidatos republicanos (esq. para dir.) Santorum, Perry, Romney, Gingrich, Ron Paul, Bachmann e Huntsman são vistos antes de debate em 15 de dezembro de 2011
Com o cáucus de terça-feira em Iowa, começa a disputa entre pré-candidatos republicanos para definir quem representará o partido contra o presidente dos EUA, o democrata Barack Obama, nas eleições presidenciais de 6 de novembro.
Após a desistência em 3 de dezembro de Herman Cain em meio a denúncias de que assediou sexualmente funcionárias e manteve um caso extraconjugal por 13 anos, há sete candidatos na disputa (em ordem alfabética): Jon Huntsman, Michelle Bachmann, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Rick Perry e Rick Santorum.
Infográfico: Veja infográfico com miniperfil dos concorrentes
A previsão é de que os eleitores participem até fim de junho de prévias nos 50 Estados americanos para definir o candidato do Partido Republicano, que esteve pela última vez no poder durante os dois mandatos de George W. Bush (2001-2009).
Se a disputa não for acirrada, há chances também de ser definida mais cedo, na chamada Super Terça-Feira de 6 de março, quando haverá votações em mais de dez Estados.
Agenda: Confira o calendário da disputa presidencial dos EUA
Cada Estado escolhe qual tipo de prévia adotar: primárias ou cáucus. E o que são cada uma delas?
A primária é uma votação secreta tradicional, com urnas e papéis, organizada normalmente pelo governo local e aberta a todos os eleitores registrados. Nas primárias fechadas, os eleitores podem participar apenas da votação do partido em que estão registrados (ou seja, só votam em uma prévia republicana os eleitores dessa legenda). Nas abertas, podem votar na primária do partido que escolherem, independentemente de sua filiação partidária. A maioria dos Estado faz primárias fechadas.

Os cáucuses, que também podem ser fechados ou abertos, são encontros que incluem debates, discursos e divisão de grupos. Quando eles começam, os eleitores se dividem de acordo com o candidato que apoiam. Para persuadir os indecisos a aderir a seu grupo, os eleitores discursam em apoio a seu candidato. No final, os organizadores contam quantos votos cada candidato recebeu.
Votação indireta
Mas nos dois casos (cáucus e primárias), os votos não vão diretamente para os candidatos. Eles na verdade determinam a quantidade de delegados (ou representantes) que cada candidato terá na convenção nacional do partido - na qual um candidato será oficialmente aclamado depois das primárias e cáucuses.
O número de delegados de cada Estado é definido pela população. A Califórnia, por exemplo, tem 55 representantes, enquanto Nova York conta com 29 e o Alasca somente com 3. Por isso, é mais importante vencer em alguns Estados do que em outros.
Para distribuir os delegados, os democratas usam um método proporcional. Cada candidato recebe o número de delegados correspondente ao percentual de votos nas primárias ou cáucuses. No Partido Republicano, um Estado pode escolher o método proporcional ou o do "ganhador leva tudo", no qual o candidato que recebeu a maioria dos votos em determinada prévia ganha todos os delegados correspondentes.
O vencedor entre os pré-candidatos republicanos será anunciado oficialmente na convenção do partido em Tampa, na Flórida, prevista para 27 de agosto. Como o presidente Obama já anunciou sua decisão de concorrer à reeleição, os democratas não realizarão prévias no partido neste ano. De qualquer forma, o líder americano será aclamado oficialmente como candidato do partido na convenção democrata, que ocorre em Charlotte, Carolina do Norte, em 3 de setembro.
Eleição propriamente dita
Em 6 de novembro, os eleitores comparecerão às urnas para escolher entre Obama e o futuro candidato republicano. E, assim como nas primárias e cáucuses, os votos em cada Estado serão usados para determinar quantos delegados cada um terá no chamado Colégio Eleitoral - que determina o presidente americano.
Saiba mais: Entenda como funciona o Colégio Eleitoral americano
Como já ocorreu no passado, há a possibilidade de um candidato com maior porcentual de votos populares não vencer por não conquistar número suficiente de delegados no Colégio Eleitoral. Exemplo disso foi a eleição de 2000, quando Bush foi eleito pela primeira vez ao vencer o democrata Al Gore.
Naquele ano, Bush recebeu 47,87% do total dos votos, enquanto Al Gore obteve 48,38%. Mas, como venceu em Estados com maior peso no Colégio Eleitoral (após semanas de contestação na Justiça da Flórida), mudou-se para a Casa Branca no ano seguinte apesar de ter recebido 500 mil votos a menos que seu concorrente.